biztrac. BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
954145794 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 03.10.2026
Activities of housing cooperatives

BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10

Org. no. 954145794 Housing cooperative (BRL) Oslo Incorporated 1984 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 1.8m
Operating profit NOK −1.5m
Equity NOK 2.9m
Incorporated 1984

Signals

2 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−1,5 mill kr).
  • Nylig endring 2026-07-09 Adresseendring registrert 2026-07-09.

BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10 is registered as a housing cooperative in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 954145794. The business is classified under activities of housing cooperatives (NACE 97.001). The company was incorporated in 1984. The company's stated purpose is: “Borettslag.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 1.8m in revenue and NOK −1.5m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 1.8m
▲ +7 %
Operating profit
NOK −1.5m
▼ −433 %
Equity
NOK 2.9m
▼ −38 %
Est. value
NOK 3.4m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
6.61
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
-12.1%
Not satisfactory
Return on total assets
Solidity
24.4%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10?

No shareholders are registered for BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10 in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10

What is the revenue of BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10?

BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10 had revenue of NOK 1.8m in 2025.

Where is BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10 based?

BORETTSLAGET FALSENSGT 25 OG 33/ROMSDALSGT 10 has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 03.10.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.