biztrac. BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
923856781 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 9 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 03.10.2026
Other cleaning activities

Anticimex A/S

Org. no. 923856781 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 1973 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 629.0m
Operating profit NOK 106.3m
Equity NOK 417.2m
Incorporated 1973
Employees 348
Share capital NOK 2.9m

Anticimex A/S is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 923856781. The business is classified under other cleaning activities (NACE 81.230). The company was incorporated in 1973 and has 348 registered employees. Registered share capital is NOK 2.9m, divided into 2750 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Desinfeksjon og skadedyrbekjemping og annen dermed forenlig virksomhet.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 629.0m in revenue and NOK 106.3m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 629.0m
▲ +6 %
Operating profit
NOK 106.3m
▲ +45 %
Equity
NOK 417.2m
▲ +30 %
Est. value
NOK 543.9m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.58
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
17.8%
Very good
Return on total assets
Solidity
49.9%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns Anticimex A/S?

ANTICIMEX ACQUISITION AB SE
Anticimex A/S
NOK 629.0m rev. · NOK 106.3m profit

Anticimex A/S has 1 registered shareholder:

  • ANTICIMEX ACQUISITION AB 100.0%
All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about Anticimex A/S

Who owns Anticimex A/S?

ANTICIMEX ACQUISITION AB is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of Anticimex A/S?

Anticimex A/S had revenue of NOK 629.0m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of Anticimex A/S?

Anders Lennart Hansson is registered as general manager of Anticimex A/S.

Where is Anticimex A/S based?

Anticimex A/S has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 03.10.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.