biztrac. BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
912112489 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 9 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 03.10.2026
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS

Org. no. 912112489 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2013 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 2.4m
Operating profit NOK 1.5m
Equity NOK 16.9m
Incorporated 2013
Share capital NOK 33,000

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 912112489. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 2013. Registered share capital is NOK 33,000, divided into 32825 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Å eie og/eller drive fast eiendom og investere i andre selskaper, og alt som dermed står i forbindelse.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 2.4m in revenue and NOK 1.5m in operating profit.

Former names: BULK GARDERMOEN II AS

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 2.4m
▲ +2 %
Operating profit
NOK 1.5m
▲ +2 %
Equity
NOK 16.9m
▼ −13 %
Est. value
NOK 15.6m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
3.15
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
8.5%
Satisfactory
Return on total assets
Solidity
97.0%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS?

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS
NOK 2.4m rev. · NOK 1.5m profit

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Group structure

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS er morselskap for 42 datterselskaper:

Frequently asked questions about BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS

Who owns BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS?

PEF HOLDING AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS?

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS had revenue of NOK 2.4m in 2025.

Where is BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS based?

BONNTJENNSVEGEN 9 AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 03.10.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.