biztrac. BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
889181982 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 03.10.2026
Retail sale of clothing

VIK VENTURE AS

Org. no. 889181982 Limited company (AS) Trondheim Incorporated 2005 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 0
Operating profit NOK −297,000
Equity NOK 18.5m
Incorporated 2005
Share capital NOK 100,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−297k kr).

VIK VENTURE AS is registered as a limited company in Trondheim, Trøndelag with organisation number 889181982. The business is classified under retail sale of clothing (NACE 47.710). The company was incorporated in 2005. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investeringer i aksjer og andeler, samt delta i tilsvarende virksomhet og annen type virksomhet.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 0 in revenue and NOK −297,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 0
Operating profit
NOK −297,000
▼ −286 %
Equity
NOK 18.5m
▲ +65 %
Est. value
NOK 59.9m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
457.43
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
35.9%
Very good
Return on total assets
Solidity
66.1%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns VIK VENTURE AS?

VIK VENTURE AS
NOK 0 rev. · NOK −297,000 profit

VIK VENTURE AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does VIK VENTURE AS own?

VIK VENTURE AS holds stakes in 3 companies:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about VIK VENTURE AS

Who owns VIK VENTURE AS?

Jostein Vik is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of VIK VENTURE AS?

VIK VENTURE AS had revenue of NOK 0 in 2025.

Where is VIK VENTURE AS based?

VIK VENTURE AS has its business address in Trondheim.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 03.10.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.